Our Philosophy: Creative people thrive most by giving and receiving high-quality, honest feedback for each others' work.
The more feedback you give for works on our homepage, the more exposure you'll earn for your work on FeedForward.?
Good to see you're still continuing to work on this project. I think it has great potential, but IMHO, it could start off at a much quicker tempo -- somehow it's dragging a bit for me the more I listen to more versions of it.
I don't necessarily know how much faster you'd want to go with it, but I think that the melody is very pretty, and that the rhythm is good, still something about the tempo, for me is a bit of a drag...
-Shoham
Well I did increase the tempo by 5 BPM mainly from your prevoius comments, but any more than that an the piece is less than 3 minutes long and I will have to add content, which currently I really don't want to do.
I have been getting mostly positive feedback on this piece from reddit and forums.
I don't know I guess I like my songs to be longer than 3 minutes long, because I think less than 3 is too short IMHO. Perhaps I will make a Speedy Mix at 2:30 and see what it sounds like and post it for ya.
Nice! So I get an attribution credit, right*!?!
The thing that I've found in song-writing over the years (since 1997 -- the the 20th Century!!!!) is that most composers break stuff down (even in long classical pieces) into 2-3 minute sections, and it's especially true for pieces with lyrics. I don't think the Beatles had more than a handful of songs avove 2:45 but in your defense, you're writing in a different genre altogether.
.
.
.
.
.
.
